The first block locates interactive media within the wider field computational culture. It offers historical and ontological analysis of coding as a mode of processing large amounts of information. It looks at the application of cybernetic theories to the development of the human-machine interface and artificial intelligence, and at the biological approach to media systems and cognition.

The second block engages with the historical development of informational architectures, from the encoding of multiple signals in one system, such as telegraphic networks, to the rise of Internet networked communication, and the invention of the relational database, whose organisation includes temporal variations (simultaneous and evolving) data. We will consider the political implications of soft modes of control (computer profiling, remote surveillance, viral marketing and branding) and the reversal use of media ecologies (from hacking to free media).

The third block focuses on debates about computational aesthetics. We examine the implications of two contrasting philosophical approaches to aesthetics: one arguing for the primacy of receptive visceral modes of interaction (Deleuze, Massumi, Munster), and the other concerned with the aesthetic of the code itself (Badiou, Harman, Knuth, Gelernter). These contrasting ontologies will provide the background to analyse the aesthetical and cultural implications of the networked image (the simultaneity of images and their implications for memory and perception) and of architectural modelling of space (the use of computation to design responsive environments).

The Critical Theory course requires students to actively participate in seminars. In the first week, students will be (arbitrarily) divided into groups of 3 to 4 members to make one presentation of 10 minutes about one or two of the key readings designated for each week. These presentations will not be assessed or impact on the overall evaluation of each student. They are designed to encourage participation (and self learning) in the theoretical development of the course.

The course brings together media theories (M McLuhan, FA Kittler, V Flusser to P Weibel, L Manovich, P Levy, G Lovink, M Fuller), scientific concepts (from Shannon and Weaver, N Wiener, A Turing, Maturana and Varela, Bateson, Prigogine, Clark) and philosophical approaches (Serres, Deleuze and Guattari, DeLanda, Latour, Stiegler, Badiou, Plant, Harman, Stengers, Massumi, Negri) to articulate a trans-disciplinary view of computational culture and system-based modes of interactivity. This trans-disciplinary view emphasises the necessity of rethinking computation away from immaterial idealism and material empiricism to develop new concepts that can critically engage with the abstract culture generated by this fast evolving field.

We use a series of defamiliarisation techniques to create an environment of enquiry rapidly producing small projects. As the lab work is student centered, the specific experiments undertaken depend on the current mix of students’ backgrounds.

Subjects covered are:

• Introduction to Media systems and Media ecologies;
• Linux command line;
• Formal Language vs Informal Language;
• the dissection of a unix file; Eco-media;
• programming Perl;
• variables lists, hashes, modules;
• editing with Vim;
• introduction to networking;
• introduction to electronics;
• introduction to physical computing (Arduino);
• Free-media;
• Radio waves including video sniffin;
• Telegraphy, submarine cables;
• garden hose telephones;
• introduction to Relational Machines- Database;
• introduction to Natural Language processing.

This Module culminates in a group project and presentation. During previous years the module has culminated in the creation of a network of Coin Laundries, in a performance, reconfiguring a Laurie Grove Bath House as a media-scape. Working with world renowned artist Shu Lee Chang on Moving Forrest in 2011, students have created performances on the Thames as an analogue computer. In 2013, students have produced Evil Media for YoHa at Transmediale.

After writing and reviewing the critical theory essay over the Christmas break, students refine their practice-based research learning objectives and, together with the lecturer, decide on an area of practice-based research to undertake either individually or in a group.

At the core of this module is a form of Action Research as a way of acting on and researching through at the same time. Students are asked to evaluate if what they produced worked as expected. If it didn't, we will together analyse what happened and what we might do differently or discuss any new leads that could help us to review the whole project. If necessary, we repeat the process.

Students learn to propose, budget and time plan research, discussing the ethics and methods in a group situation.

Some students choose to work in a wider social context that have involved liaison with prostitute organisations, older people, people with learning difficulties, asylum seekers and people with mental health issues. Other students decide to look into biotechnologies, algorithms, operating systems, social media, computational aesthetics.

Students taking this module previously developed open-source software, telephone networks and mobile phones apps. They have curated shows, produced individual artworks, new web platforms, interactive dance, broadcast systems, games, musical instruments, sound scapes, and researched the interaction of databases and archaeological sites.

During the third term, students refine an element of their research from term two for a public event usually held in early July.

In previous years, students have produced an exposition in which they have created a public interface to their project or ongoing research or enterprise. These expositions involved talking and demonstrating the findings of projects to invited groups and the general public.

Students learn to refine an element of research, produce a public event, produce copy and art work to deadlines, plan publicity and document research.

• Please see the students’ blogs for details of the projects undertaken.

This course asks the questions: What is cultural studies. and, what is culture? A wide range of cultural theory dealing with issues concerning technology, art media, philosophy, and the economy, are explored in order to address a number of connected questions that span the field of contemporary cultural studies. Can culture be understood per se or may we only ever consider cultures? What is the nature of culture and how should we try to understnad what is specific to contemporary culture? What is cultural studies in a changing order, whereby China, India, and Latin America - the East and the South - become the drivers of global change? We look at the cultural foundations of the global economy: at 'individualist' and 'relational' orders of value. We ask who this non-Western  other is and again, this time wth new eyes, who is 'the West'? We enquire into the Greek and Jewish-Christian transcendental God and in the process investigagte its association with the economic culture of our age; for its messianic ethos; for its critique of law; of neoliberalism and sovereignty and its everlasting obsession with justice; we think it as well for its implicit universalism and ask the broader question: what is universalism? We look at cultures of the East (especially China) and of the South. Here, as opposed to Western ontology, are questions of conduct and 'the way'; as opposed to the Western other-worldly God, immanent this-worldly, non-monotheistic, regimes of religion. We look at the immanent and relation culture of the gift and the clan, the linguistic foundations of Chinese culture. We ask, in this context, whether a new global universalism is possible.

M. Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics
A. Badiou, Saint Paul: The Foundations of Universalism
Martin Heideggger, 'The Question Concerning Technology'
Francois Jullien, Detour and Access
Aristotle, Metaphysics
Marcel Mauss, The Gift
G Deleuze and F Guattari, Anti-Oedipus
Bernard Stiegler, Technics and Time
Sigmund Freud, New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis
Max Weber, Religion of India

This course traces lines of intersection and divergence between theories of language or textual media and theories of the image. It aims to familiarize students with some of the problems that contemporary theory has inherited from previous attempts to think the relations among looking, seeing, knowing; writing, inscription, and memory. A secondary aim is to complicate dominant stories about the relationship of one set of paradigms, often textual or written, to rationality, communication, and instrumental thinking and the relationship of other, often visual paradigms to affect, embodiment, and a heightened sense of immediacy or violence in the confrontation with radical alterity. Special attention will be given to the place of models of language and of aesthetic experience in the definition of public space and political life, and to the legacies of modernity as seen through the lens of the “new” technologies of memory and of inscription via which it arrives. Given this concern with political and ethical dimensions of these models and paradigms, the course can be considered a 21st-century course in aesthetic theory.

 Readings will be drawn from primary texts across a broad range of fields, including philosophy, literary and critical theory, linguistics, optics, and photography history and theory. We will consider the different statuses accorded text and image with respect to epistemological questions: questions about truth, or about the limits of reason and of knowledge. We will ask why these questions cannot be considered in isolation from their ideological and political implications, and we will explore various accounts, given in the theoretical literature, of the power of texts and images actually to determine what we think or know. Marxist theories of the commodity, historical accounts of colonial uses of photography, and theories of race as a visual technology are all equally apropos. 

Students are expected to read closely and in depth and to do significant independent research in the relevant bodies of secondary literature in the preparation of the final essay. Successful essays will take into account a range of complications and counter-arguments in relation to a clearly defined problem and set of readings and will simultaneously demonstrate a command of the full spectrum of arguments presented in the lectures over the term. I.e., the lectures are structured in such a way that arguments are cumulative and knowledge requires synthesis, and it is essential that students attend all of the weekly lectures as well as a weekly seminar (see below).

Specific questions will include how philosophies of nature, being, and mind are entangled with art; perception with poiesis; mimesis with idealism; tekhne with fiction and revolution. It is common knowledge why the poets are cast out of Plato’s republic, but why is it that the true statesman, like the true philosopher, can be trusted to use figural language, when the rhetorician and the sophist cannot? Why does Marx’s commodity speak in hieroglyphs, whereas the master trope of ideology is the camera obscura? Why is mass literacy understood to be a baseline condition of modern democracy and yet a mass public transformed by globalization is thought to be readily deceived, perhaps now more than ever before, by pictures? Why could the Romanian revolution, the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the first Gulf War only be televised, whereas the dissemination of images from other wars has been confined almost exclusively to the Internet?

Photography will be an important point of reference throughout, allowing us to trace in detail the history of a given technology, and to consider the ways that images and their meanings may or may not be both historically specific and culturally bound. Focused treatment of key problems in the history and theory of photography will highlight the legacy of all these entanglements for European modernity and for the ongoing production and deployment of non-European others. We will explore the obvious yet still undertheorized connections between photography and colonialism and the corollary destabilization of common understandings of photography as the inheritor of Western pictorial traditions (the metaphysical understanding of perspectivalism, the reduction of the physical world into units of information). How does photography help to expose or, alternatively, obscure the time-honored yet continuously shifting connections between race, gender, and other ruses and techniques of power? How best to analyze the collusion and transformation of textual and visual memory regimes in the development of new technologies and regimes of surveillance, war, and power?

 Indicative reading list:

 Agamben, Giorgio, The Man Without Content (Stanford: Stanford UP, 1999).

Alloula, Malek, The Colonial Harem, trans. Myrna Godzich and Wlad Godzich (Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1986).

Azoulay, Azoulay, Death’s Showcase: The Power of Image in Contemporary Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Zone Books/MIT Press, 2003) and The Civil Contract of Photography, trans. Rela Mazali and Ruvik Danieli. (Cambridge, MA: Zone Books/MIT Press, 2008).

Barthes, Roland, “The Reality Effect” (The Rustle of Language) and Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, trans. Richard Howard (New York: Hill and Wang, 1981).

Bataille, Georges, Manet, trans. Austryn Wainhouse and James Emmons (Geneva: Skira, 1955).

Bersani, Leo, The Death of Stéphane Mallarmé (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1982).

Blanchot, Maurice, “Literature and the Right to Death,” in The Work of Fire, trans. Charlotte Mandell (Stanford: Stanford UP, 1995) and The Writing of the Disaster, trans. Ann Smock (Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1995).

Breton, André, Surrealism and Painting, trans. Simon Watson Taylor (London: Macdonald and Co., 1972).

Crandall, Jordan, ed., Under Fire, Volumes 1-2 (Rotterdam: Witte de With, 2005).

Crary, Jonathan, Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the 19th Century (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992).

de Man, Paul, Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust (New Haven: Yale UP, 1979) and “Sign and Symbol in Hegel’s Aesthetics,” in The Aesthetic Ideology, ed. Andrzej Warminski (Minneapolis: U of Minnesota, 1996).

Derrida, Jacques and Bernard Stiegler, Echographies of Television: Filmed Interviews, trans. Jennifer Bajorek (London: Polity, 2002).

Derrida, Jacques, “…that dangerous supplement…” (Of Grammatology) and Dissemination, trans. Barbara Johnson (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1983).

Descartes, René. Optics (selections).

Didi-Huberman, Georges, The Invention of Hysteria: Charcot and the Photographic Iconography of the Salpêtrière (selections);

Dyer, Richard, White: Essays on Race and Culture (London: Routledge, 1997).

Edwards, Elizabeth, Raw Histories: Photographs, Anthropology, and Museums (Oxford: Berg, 2001).

Fabian, Johannes, Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object (New York: Columbia UP, 1983).

Foucault, Michel, This Is Not a Pipe.

Gonzalez, Jennifer, “Morphologies: Race as a Visual Technology,” in Only Skin Deep, ed. Coco Fusco and Brian Wallis (New York: Harry N. Abrams, 2003).

Hegel, G.W.F., Introduction to Aesthetics (Oxford: Clarendon, 1975).

Heidegger, Martin, “The Age of the World Picture,” in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (New York: Harper and Row, 1977).

hooks, bell, “The Oppositional Gaze,” in Black Looks: Race and Representation (Boston: South End P, 1992).

Keenan, Thomas. “Looking like Flames and Falling like Stars: Kosovo, ‘the First Internet War’”; “Mobilizing Shame.”

Kofman, Sarah, “The Melancholy of Art,” in Sarah Kofman, Selected Writings, ed. Georgia Albert et al. (Stanford: Stanford UP, 2007) and “Rousseau's Phallocratic Ends,” in Nancy Fraser & Sandra Lee Bartky, eds., Revaluing French Feminism: Critical Essays on Difference, Agency, and Culture (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana UP, 1992).

Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Tristes Tropiques (London and New York: Penguin, 1992 [1955]).

Lindberg, David, C., “Ancient Theories of Vision,” Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1976).

Mallarmé, Stéphane, selected poetry and prose.

Marin, Louis, To Destroy Painting, trans. Mette Hjort (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1995).

Negri, Antonio, The Political Descartes: Reason, Ideology, and the Bourgeois Project (London: Verso, 2006).

Plato, Republic.

Poole, Deborah, “Equivalent Images” (Vision, Race, and Modernity).

Raiford, Leigh, “The Consumption of Lynching Images,” in Coco Fusco and Brian Wallis, eds., Only Skin Deep, (New York: Harry N. Abrams, 2003).

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Confessions (selection from Book One).

Saussure, Ferdinand de, Course in General Linguistics, ed. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966).

Sekula, Allan, “The Body and the Archive,” in Richard Bolton, ed., The Contest of Meaning: Critical Histories of Photography (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989).

Sontag, Susan, On Photography (New York: Picador/Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1977) and“Regarding the Torture of Others,” in The New York Times, May 23, 2004.

Starobinski, Jean. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988).

Virilio, Paul, War and Cinema: The Logistics of Perception, trans. Patrick Camiller (London and New York: Verso, 1989)

The aim of this course is to introduce students to canonical, founding texts of Postcolonialism. Close, first-hand reading of texts is emphasized and student are required to probe the whole spectrum of postcolonial thinking -- from literary theory, politics, psychoanalysis, diaspora studies, race and gender studies, to philosophy, art, anthropology and history. Geopolitically, the emphasis is on the non-West and on the connections, linkages and translatory cultures forged through colonization, movements, travel and deterritorialization. We seek to problematize the very notion of post-coloniality -- understood not as a temporal marker but more as a style of thought -- as a problem. We begin with Edward Said’s Orientalism, and ponder the founding role of discourse in shaping geopolitical destinies and historical subjectivities. And that takes us into complex questions about the complicity between power and knowledge and the legacy of slavery and colonialism in the present. These discussions are pursued throughout the seminars as we proceed from Bhabha through Spivak and Gilroy to Mbembe and Povinelli. We interrogate Bhabha’s ideas of colonial ambivalence and mimicry and read Fanon and Glissant in the light of a generalised, global unhomliness to mark out the time of the postcolonial ‘contramodernity’ (Gilroy). While reading Spivak and Povinelli, we interrogate the enunciative modalities of liberal discourse and look for strategic prohibitions within which would not let the subaltern speak. The question about agency and location is confronted headlong in Chakrabarty’s Provincializing Europe while in

Through Timothy Mitchell’s Colonizing Egypt we debate the role of representation in non-western modernity. Through an interrogation of Deleuze’s idea of difference, we try to make sense of the postcolonial ‘right to difference' in the context of the politics of multiculturalism. Other themes highlighted in the course are: empire, secularism, governmentality, multiculturalism, gender and sexual politics, representation, minorities in Europe and diaspora.

Indicative reading:

Talal Asad, Formations of the Secular, 2003.

Homi Bhabha, The Location of Culture, 1994.

Sion Bignall and Paul Patton (ed.), Deleuze and the Postcolonial, 2010.

Dipesh Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe, 2000.

Gayatri Chakrovorty Spivak, Can the Subaltern Speak?, 1988.

Franz Fanon, The Wretched of The Earth, 2004.

Edouard Glissant, Poetics of Relation, 1997.

Paul Gilroy, Against Race, 2000.

Peter Hallward, Absolutely Postcolonial, 2002.

Achille Mbembe, On the Postcolony, 2001.

Naoki Sakai, Translation and Subjectivity: On "Japan" and Cultural

Nationalism, 1997.

Charles Taylor, The Politics of Recognition, 1994

This course involves a close reading of Karl Marx’s Capital (Volume One). The connections between cultural studies and critiques of capitalism are considered in an interdisciplinary context (cinema studies, anthropology, musicology, international relations, and philosophy) which reaches from Marx through to Film Studies, from ethnographic approaches to Heidegger, from anarchism and surrealism to German critical theory and poststructuralism/post-colonialism/post-early-for-christmas. Topics covered include: alienation, commodification, production, technology, education, subsumption, anti-imperialism, anti-war movement and complicity. Using a series of illustrative films (documentary and fiction) and key theoretical texts (read alongside the text of Capital), we examine contemporary capitalism as it shifts, changes, lurches through its very late 20th and early 21st century manifestations – we will look at how cultural studies copes with (or does not cope with) class struggle, anti-colonialism, new subjectivities, cultural politics, media, virtual and corporate worlds.

Indicative reading:

The main reading will be the relevant chapter or chapters of Capital each week. Do also read the footnotes, they are sometimes quite entertaining (attacks on ‘moneybags’, comments on Shakespeare, notes on bamboo ‘thrashings’, and celebrations of the work of Leonard Horner, factory inspector).

K Marx, Capital: Volume One (Penguin or Progress Press) 

T Adorno, Minima Moralia 

G Bataille, The Accursed Share

Marx and Engels, The Communist Manifesto

F. Jameson, Representing Capital: A Reading of Volume On

S Lotringer (ed), Hatred of Capitalism: A Reader

G Spivak, A Critique of Postcolonial Reason

M. Taussig, My Cocaine Museum

This course sets out the key theorizations  of the culture industry.  Whilst incorporating classical figurations of the culture industry, the course is primarily concerned to assemble a clear engagement with contemporary research such as those spearheaded by leading researchers at Goldsmiths.  The organization and substance of work and of precarious labour, of the developing debates and mechanisms of ‘intellectual property’ and cultural workers’ development of institutions and networks as well as contemporary configurations of the professional will be discussed.  Students will learn to strategise cultural production and intervention through exploration of relevant material.  The globalization of the culture industry will provide a persistent and ambitious point of reference.   The course will combine a critical assessment of the most significant theoretical frameworks for analyzing and understanding the contemporary cultural industries, with detailed analysis of the structure of specific cultural industries. The opening of the course will introduce key conceptual frameworks for interpreting the cultural industries, starting with the classic macro perspectives of the ‘culture industry thesis’ developed by The Frankfurt School, and Political Economy, which is concerned with the economic structure of the creative economy. These theoretical frameworks are read critically in relation to contemporary structural changes within the social world, primarily the shift from an industrial to a knowledge based economy, the rise of globalization, reorganizations in the labour market, and the proliferation of symbolic goods, brands and logos. As the course continues it draws more broadly from contemporary cultural theory in order to develop a model of the cultural industries which remains attuned to the influence of economic structure and ‘the domination of the commodity’ while being able to account also for the complex texture of innovation, creativity, and restructured power relationships which are emerging.

Indicative Bibliography

Theodor Adorno &  Martin Horkheimer, ‘The Culture Industry, Enlightenment as Mass Deception’, in, Dialectic of Enlightenment, Verso, London, 1979

Theodor Adorno, The Culture Industry, Routledge, London, 2004

Bewes, T and Gilbert, J 2000 Cultural Capitalism: Politics after new Labour

Ulrich Beck and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim, Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences, Sage (Theory, Culture & Society), London, 2001

Ulrich Beck, The Brave New World of Work, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2000

Pierre Bourdieu, The Field of Cultural Production, 1993

Pierre Bourdieu, The Weight of the World, Polity, Cambridge, 2000

Paul Du Gay, ed. 1997 Production of Culture/ Cultures of Production.

Paul Du Gay and Pryke M. eds. Cultural Economy: Cultural analysis and Commercial Life, Sage, London, 2001

Kodwo Eshun, More Brilliant Than The Sun, Quartet, London, 2000

Dick  Hebdige, Hiding in the Light, Routledge, London, 1989

David Hesmondhalgh, Cultural Industries, 2nd edn. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi, 2007

John Howkins, The creative economy: how people make money from ideas, Allen Lane/The Penguin Press, 2001

J. Hutnyk ‘Adorno at Womad, South Asian Crossovers and the Limits of Hybridity’, in Postcolonial Studies Vol 1 no 3, 1999.

J Hutnyk and S Sharma eds., ‘Music and Politics An Introduction’, in Theory Culture and Society vol 17 no 3, June 2000

Ettema, J & D. Whitney eds.. ‘Individuals in Mass Media Organisations: Creativity and Constraint’1982

Scott Lash and John Urry,  Economies of Signs and Space, Sage, London, 1994

Scott Lash and Celia Lury, Global Culture Industry: The Mediation of Things, Cambridge: Polity, 2006

Charles Leadbetter, Living on Thin Air, 1999

Angela McRobbie, In the Culture Society: Art, Fashion and Popular Music, Routledge, London, 1999

Angela McRobbie, British Fashion Design: Rag Trade or Image Industry?, Routledge, London, 1998

Angela McRobbie, 'Fashion as a Culture Industry', in, Stella Bruzzi and Pamela Church Gibson, eds., Fashion Culture: Theories, Explanations and Analysis, Routledge, London, 2000

Angela McRobbie, 'From Holloway to Hollywood: Happiness at Work in the Cultural Economy' in Paul du Gay and M Pryke (eds.), Cultural Economy: Cultural Analysis and Commercial Life, Sage, 2001

Angela McRobbie, 'Clubs to Companies: Notes on the Decline of Political Culture in Speeded Up Creative Worlds', Cultural Studies, vol. 16  no.4, 2002,  pp.516-531

Miege, B The Capitalisation of Cultural Production,. 1993

Keith Negus, Music Genres and Corporate Cultures, Routledge, London, 1999

Andrew Ross, No Collar, the humane workplace and its hidden costs, Basic Books, New York, 2003

Saskia Sassen, Cities In A World Economy, 1994

Herbert Schiller, Culture, Inc. The Corporate Takeover of Public Expression, 1989

Richard Sennett, The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. W. W. Norton, 1998.

Julian Stallabrass, Art Incorporated, Verso, London 2005

Sharon Zukin, Loft Living, 1989
 

One of the problems that the study of the culture industry presents is that in its very nature its key object of analysis, the culture industry, as a whole has the status of a theoretical or policy-oriented fiction.  Such a status does not negate its analytical use, but reflection on the particularly fragile and temporary nature of the field and its associated circumscription by notions of policy need to be brought into productive comparison with actual cultural practices.  Equally, those active in the field described by this term recognise the term as belonging to a separate category of knowledge than that required to succeed in the production of culture.  Culture involves complex networks of production ranging from the institutional and the transnational to the interpersonal and aesthetic. Here questions of genre, of variegated economic models and ultimately of existential and aesthetic rationale, break up any treatment of the culture industry as a coherent whole.  Driven by questions of practice this core course is organized around a series of more detailed analyses of specific cultural dynamics, where the theoretical models from part one are brought to bear on individual areas of practice and the ways that they can and cannot be thought of in terms of ‘industry’. The section will focus on the empirical structure of particular, methodologies for researching the culture industries, and the practice of cultural workers within these fields. In addition to lectures by academic researchers with particular expertise in music, fashion, radio and new economies, students will have access to practitioners from the fields of radio, film, music and art.
 

Indicative Bibliography

Kathy Acker, ‘Writing, Identity and Copyright in the Net Age’, in, Bodies of Work, Serpent’s Tail, London, 1997, pp.66-80

Bernadette Corporation, Reena Spaulings, Semiotext(e), New York, 2004

Nicholas Bourriaud, Relational Aesthetics, Editions du Réel, Bordeux, 2002

Claire Bishop, ed., Participation, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2006

Gilles Deleuze, Francis Bacon, the logic of sensation, Continuum, London

Peter Drucker, (1969). The Age of Discontinuity; Guidelines to Our changing Society. Harper and Row, New York. ISBN 0465089844

Thomas Franks, The Birth of Cool, beat, be-bop and the american avant garde, Free Press, New York, 2001

Media Philosophy is taught by Bernard Stiegler who is spending part of his time as a Professor at Goldsmiths. Bernard is author with Jacques Derrida of Echographies of Television, the celebrated Technics and Time and many other books. His work is translated in 15 languages. He has been a curator in Paris with Jean François Lyotard was Director IRCAM in Paris (after Pierre Boulez). He now heads up the Centre for Cultural Development at Centre Pompidou in Paris. He is the world’s most widely cited media theorist.  This five-lecture course investigates the time and space of media. Of how technological media are involved in a process of what Plato called anamnesis (‘unforgetting’). It takes Derrida’s idea of language or ‘writing’ and incorporates this into a much more encompassing phenomena of technics. This course goes beyond Heidegger to establish how human beings are already and constitutively technical beings.  We address the psychoanalysis of our technological culture. We look at its irreducible entanglement in images, in the psychoanalytic imaginary.  We investigate how the incorporation of this imaginary, via media technologies, is at the heart of contemporary capitalism. We go beyond Heidegger’s being-toward death to look at a futurity of media and technology that violates the finitude of human beings. We understand media as much from an engineering point of view (Simondon) as from a philosophical one. We look at how information and media comprise self-reproducing non-linear systems; and how this involves the interchange of information between media and ourselves as neurological beings.    This course is uncompromising in dealing with the philosophical questions underpinning contemporary media and technology. And is at the same time always embedded in the critique of today's capitalist political economy.

Readings:
B. Stiegler, Technics and Time
J. Derrida and B. Stiegler, Echographies of Television
G. Simondon, Psychic and Collective Individuation
J. Lacan, The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book 7.
M. Heidegger, Being and Time
J. Derrida, Writing and difference
Plato, Timaeus and Critias
B. Stiegler, For a New Critique of Political Economy

If, in modernity, bare life enters the stage of history and the field of politics for the first time - as the philosophers Michel Foucault and Giorgio Agamben have extensively argued - and we are living in a biopolitical age in which power intimately accesses and regulates this life, how do aesthetics register, mirror and contest these developments? The desire for modernist, avant-garde and critical art to burst their banks and fuse with 'everyday life', the chaos and contingency of social life, the body as a site of experience and action, parallels power's increasing need to act upon 'active subjects' and to co-opt the vitality of populations. This course will move schematically through key artists, movements and conditions of beholding, from the late 18th century until today, to explore this relationship and consider art's dual role as pioneer and antagonist of biopolitical power.

What is the social in social media? In this course we undertake theoretical and practical groundwork to develop an understanding of how social worlds operate. We look at a wide range of social processes and practices, both offline and online. The aim is to search for concepts and ideas that enable us to understand sociality, as it is found in existing forms of social media, and, more importantly, in that which is yet to be developed.

We will ask questions such as: What does it mean when we talk about networks or communities, audiences or users, needs or practices, media or mediation, interaction or collaboration, relations or ties, dyadic friendships or groups, assemblages or systems, structures or co-individuation, organisations or societies, publics and privacy, atmospheres and affects, cultures and ethos? How shall we understand the time of sociality, from presence and liveness to emergence and archives? How can we grasp a self that is at the same time a node in various networks, a member of various forms of collectivities, a habitus with a complex history, a mix of subjectivities, identities and a performance of confession? How should we take account of class, gender and other (demographic) differences? How can we start to understand mixed economies of digital and non-digital labour, money and various forms of values – and what is exploitation? What is the difference of exchange and gifts? What is the role of property, and what are its alternatives? What are individual and collective interests, and how are they organised in games? How can we conceptualise order, formal and informal rules, hegemony, control, power and its opposites? What does it mean, if all this plays out in the forms and limits of data, metadata, code, algorithms, texts, links, lists and (moving) images? To what extend can the social be programmed, and what happens, if developers and entrepreneurs envisage, co-create and co-control social worlds? What do we know about social, cultural and political impacts of social media, and what are possibilities of activist and hacktivist interventions? 

In the lectures you will be introduced to concepts and theoretical takes, both classical and contemporary, that will help you to think through such questions. In the seminars you learn to apply these impulses to case studies. You engage in short ethnographic explorations, both offline and online (the seminars therefore includes training in basic ethnographic techniques). While you do so, you will also learn how to analyse specificities of various forms of media hardware in contemporary everyday life’s multi-screen environments. You develop ideas for new forms of social media and learn to address these to specific communities. You discuss the influence of cultural backgrounds, and you engage in the latest debates on social media.

You will be assessed continuously throughout the course. You will develop, often in group work, four small case studies, which each lead to 1000 word essays and sometimes to presentations. Some of these case studies are based on ethnographic explorations, others can use alternative methods, some are about offline social worlds, others are online case studies, or look into the integration of offline and online practices. Mediating the Social is the core course for the new MA/MSc in Creating Social Media (MACSM). MACSM students will write a further 1000 word reflexive essay on how one theme of the course informed a practical project. Non-MACSM students will develop a concept idea for an intervention into social media.

Indicative reading

Auslander, P. (2008), Liveness. Performance in a Mediatized Culture, Routledge

Baym, N. (2010), Personal Connections in the Digital Age, Polity

Benkler, Y. (2006), The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, Yale University Press

Berry Slater, J. and Pauline van Mourik Broekman (ed) (2009), Proud to be Flesh, Mute

Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press

Chun, W. (2011), Programmed Visions, MIT Press

Collins, R. (2004), Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton University Press

DeLanda, M. (2006), A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity, Continuum. 

Gluckman, M. (1958), Analysis of a Social Situation in Modern Zululand, Rhodes-Livingstone Paper 28

Goody, J. (1977), The Domestication of the Savage Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Illouz, E. (2007), Cold Intimacies. The Making of Emotional Capitalism, Polity

Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001), ‘Objectual Practice’ in Theodore Schatzki et al (ed.),The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Routledge, 175–188

Marx, K. and F. Engels (1998), The Communist Manifesto, Penguin

Mauss, M. (1990), The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies, Routledge.

McKenzie Wark, K. (2007), Hacker Manifesto, Harvard University Press

Scholz, T. and Laura Y. Liu (2010), From Mobile Playgrounds to Sweatshop City, Situated Technologies Pamphlets 7

Simondon, G. (1958), Du mode d'existence des objets techniques. Paris. (Partial translation on available on web)

Turkle, S. (2011), Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other, Basic Books 

White, H. C. (2008), Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge (Second edition). Princeton University Press

Software Studies is specifically concerned with the inter-relation between the cultural, social, and the technical. The course provides key theoretical tools for understnading digital technologies and the software that underlies them. It provides an essential interface for courses that aim to link cultural and social concerns and practices with the technical.

Students will read and work with current and historical documents from the history of computing and computing culture, alongside those from cultural theory, as such this is be a uniquely interdisciplinary course that brings together and works through different approaches to the problematic of effective and inventive working in contemporary creative and social technologies.

Software studies is an interdisciplinary field that has emerged over the last decade amonthst an international range of scholars and has a particular strength in Goldsmiths. It combines approaches form the arts, humanities and social sciences with those drawn from computing, in order to develop a creative and critical approach to the theories and practices of computing. Software is understood to be a core, yet under-theorised, aspect of contempoarary culture and society. This course examines how software, and computing more broadly, is deply implicated in the development of aesthetics, political forms, social agency and the generation of new forms of subjectivity. It follows a line of enquiry that draws together inventive critical thinking from technologists, hackers, computer scientists, philosophers, artists and cultural theorists, thus providing the context for a rich discussion on the nature of contemporary software cultures.

Students will write an essay or investigative report into a software stysem, a programming language, an aspect of the history of computing, work of software art, or other such topic.