'Expert evidence and the empirical’
Whilst the old principle of 'sound science' still holds sway within scientific
advisory committees, such bodies are under increasing pressure to acknowledge
uncertainty, recognise values and ethics, address competing problem framings,
and engage with stakeholders (even take on lay members). What does this mean
for the status of 'the empirical' within decision-making, policy-related and
regulatory contexts? Can the status of scientific expertise survive these shifting
circumstances? Are we witnessing a changed understanding of the nature of empirical
evidence? In what ways are advisory bodies attempting to ringfence evidence claims
in the new, more transparent circumstances?
Biography
Alan is Dean of the Faculty of Social and Environmental Studies in
Liverpool university. He joined Liverpool university in 2004 from Brunel University
where he held the position of Pro-Vice-Chancellor in charge of Research and
Enterprise. Alan is also Professor of Science and Technology Policy in the
University of Liverpool Management School and his own research interests are
in science and technology studies, scientific governance, environmental sociology
and science-public relations. His research has been funded by a variety of
bodies including the ESRC, Nuffield Foundation, Leverhulme Trust and the European
Commission. Currently he is a principal investigator with the Programme on
Understanding Risk at the University of East Anglia, Cardiff University and
The University of Liverpool.
His recent books include:
Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London, SE14 6NW, UK
Telephone: + 44 (0)20 7919 7171
Goldsmiths has charitable status
© 2012 Goldsmiths, University of London. Copyright, Disclaimer and Company information