Research Integrity at Goldsmiths
Goldsmiths is a signatory to the Universities UK Concordat to Support Research Integrity and has adopted the UK Research and Integrity Office’s Code of Practice for Research as its institutional Code of Practice on Research Ethics and Integrity.
The Chair of Goldsmiths Research Ethics and Integrity Sub-Committee (REISC), currently Professor Anna Traianou a.traianou (@gold.ac.uk), acts as first point of contact for anyone wanting more information on matters of research integrity and as a confidential liaison for whistle-blowers or anyone else wishing to raise concerns about research integrity.
The formal procedures for dealing with allegations related to research integrity are set out in Goldsmiths Research Misconduct Procedure (PDF) and Goldsmiths Research Misconduct Procedure Flowchart (PDF).
Goldsmiths publish an Annual Statement reporting matters of research integrity at the university:
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2019/20 (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2018/19 (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2017/18 (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2016/17 (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2015/16 (PDF)
- Research Integrity Annual Statement 2014/15 (PDF)
Research Ethics at Goldsmiths
The ethical scrutiny of research conducted by academic staff at Goldsmiths is the responsibility of the Research Ethics and Integrity Sub-Committee (REISC). REISC scrutinises ethical approval applications in order to ascertain that the research abides by both general and disciplinary principles and standards of research ethics.
Such principles relate to, for example, harm to human participants, independence of researchers, integrity of research, fidelity to verifiable knowledge, consent to research and use of data, and rights to privacy, confidentiality and anonymity.
Academic researchers have ethical obligations to the people, species and materials they study, to the stakeholders with whom they work, and to the environment within which the research is situated. Such obligations are not only based in the ‘here and now’ but are also oriented to the possibility of future knowledge production by others.
All research projects – that are concerned with living (or recently deceased) beings or with data and materials derived from such beings or that might unduly affect the environment and hence change the lives of beings within that environment - require ethical approval.
Ethical approval applications related to research projects led by undergraduate, postgraduate and PhD students are managed by relevant academic departments. Oversight is provided by Goldsmiths’ Research Ethics and Integrity Sub-Committee.
Covid-19 Guidance for Research Ethics
As we continue to move through lockdown phases, a significant degree of uncertainty remains about the kind of research activities that are possible.
It is our obligation to seek advice about any planned or ongoing research activity and to ensure that:
- Ethical clearance has been received prior to commencing research;
- Research Ethics and Integrity Departmental Committees (in the case of students) and Goldsmiths REISC (in the case of academic staff) have been informed where there has been substantial change to planned programme of research for which ethical clearance has already been received;
- Any international partners are following the guidelines and advice of their home university and other relevant authorities about the conduct of research; and) we follow Goldsmiths, Public Health and FCO guidelines related to face to face meetings and travel.
For further guidance about research during Covid-19 see: Recommended Checklist for Research Communities in a Pandemic.
Ethical approval forms, templates and guidance for academic staff are available on the College’s intranet, Goldmine.