skip to main content
Goldsmiths - University of London
  • Students, Staff and Alumni
  • Search Students, Staff and Alumni
  • Study
  • Course finder
  • International
  • More
  • Search
  • Study
  • Courses
  • International
  • More
 
Main menu

Primary

  • About Goldsmiths
  • Study with us
  • Research
  • Business and partnerships
  • For the local community
  • Faculties and Schools
  • News and features
  • Events
  • Give to Goldsmiths
Staff & students

Staff + students

  • New students: Welcome
  • Students
  • Alumni
  • Library
  • Timetable
  • Learn.gold - VLE
  • Email - Outlook
  • IT support
  • Staff directory
  • Staff intranet - Goldmine
  • Graduate School - PGR students
  • Teaching and Learning Innovation Centre
  • Events admin
In this section

Breadcrumb navigation

  • Events
    • Degree Shows
    • Black History Month
  • Calendar

The nation-state in modernist social theory: the cases of H Arendt, R Aron and T Parsons


1 Jun 2006, 2:00pm - 4:00pm

12th Floor, Warmington Tower, Goldsmiths College

Event overview

Cost Free
Department
Website Unit for Global Justice
Contact d.hirsh(@gold.ac.uk)
extension 7730

The Unit for Global Justice at Goldsmiths College, University of London, presents a paper by Daniel Chernilo, University Alberto Hurtado Santiago

This paper is part of a larger research project which aims at the reconstruction of ‘a social theory of the nation-state beyond methodological nationalism’. Methodological nationalism can be defined as the all-pervasive equation in social theory between the theoretical concept of society and the historical development of the nation-state - the nation-state as the natural and necessary representation of society in modernity. In opposition to the widespread claim that social theory as such has fallen under the trap of methodological nationalism, this paper discusses the way in which three leading theorists in the 1950s and 1960s theorised the problematic position of the nation-state in modernity. I thus review: (1) how Talcott Parsons’ emphasis on the democratic rule of law arises out of the experiences of its sudden breakdown in Weimar Germany; (2) how Hannah Arendt’s understanding of the rise of totalitarianism results from her assessment of the nation-state’s inability to resist the disintegrative forces that pull modernity apart and (3) how Raymond Aron’s depiction of industrialism overtakes the differences to be found between Communist regimes, recently de-colonised nation-states and Western states. The conclusion is that - even at the time when the faith in the nation-state was seemingly at its peak - the nation-state’s position looked much less secure and stable than is usually assumed. If analysed in relation with its current threats, the nation-state cannot be thought of as the organising principle around which the project of modernity coheres but rather as one of modernity’s most ambivalent structural developments.

Unit for Global Justice

Dates & times

Date Time Add to calendar
1 Jun 2006 2:00pm - 4:00pm
  • apple
  • google
  • outlook

Accessibility

If you are attending an event and need the College to help with any mobility requirements you may have, please contact the event organiser in advance to ensure we can accommodate your needs.

Event controls

  • About us
  • Accessibility statement
  • Contact us
  • Cookie use
  • Find us
  • Copyright and disclaimer
  • Jobs
  • Modern slavery statement
Admin login
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • TikTok
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
© Goldsmiths, University of London Back to top