skip to main content
Goldsmiths - University of London
  • Students, Staff and Alumni
  • Search Students, Staff and Alumni
  • Study
  • Course finder
  • International
  • More
  • Search
  • Study
  • Courses
  • International
  • More
 
Main menu

Primary

  • About Goldsmiths
  • Study with us
  • Research
  • Business and partnerships
  • For the local community
  • Faculties and Schools
  • News and features
  • Events
  • Give to Goldsmiths
Staff & students

Staff + students

  • New students: Welcome
  • Students
  • Alumni
  • Library
  • Timetable
  • Learn.gold - VLE
  • Email - Outlook
  • IT support
  • Staff directory
  • Staff intranet - Goldmine
  • Graduate School - PGR students
  • Teaching and Learning Innovation Centre
  • Events admin
In this section

Breadcrumb navigation

  • Events
    • Degree Shows
    • Black History Month
  • Calendar

Mark Kelly (Middlesex): 'Foucault against prophecy and utopia'


21 Feb 2012, 4:00pm - 6:00pm

305, Professor Stuart Hall Building

Event overview

Department Research Group in Continental Philosophy (InC)
Website Free
Contact Sebastian Truskolaski

InC Seminar Series: 'The future: philosophy between utopia and end-time prophecy'

Mark Kelly (Middlesex): 'Foucault against prophecy and utopia'

Michel Foucault refuses two forms of thinking about the future: prophecy and utopia. Expanding on Foucault’s rejection, I argue that claims to know what the future either can or will hold for society are epistemically unjustifiable and politically dangerous, because we cannot know the real consequences such thinking will have. Such thinking hence ought to be abandoned, though it may be politically useful if understood as merely speculative fiction that serves to open up the space of thinking.

I then argue for the extension of these insights to ethics, suggesting that the same considerations also apply against either prophetic or utopian thinking in the horizon of our personal lives. I will argue that Foucault’s refusal to think the future in a definite or utopian way can be extended to desire itself, with certain forms of desire in personal life being utopian, and carrying with themselves similar dangers to political utopianism, though rejecting Foucault’s valorisation of pleasure in favour of a focus on immediate desires. I consider this point in relation to the Lacanian problematic of fantasy and desire, with a view to countering the objcetion that utopianism is inevitable as a form of fantasy about the future. Though fantasy and desire are indeed ineluctable aspects of human subjectivity, I conclude, following Lacan himself and Yannis Stavrakakis, that we nevertheless ought to do without either prophetic or utopian content for these, since, from a Lacanian perspective, such aspirations hold out an impossible hope of a final healing of the dehissance at the heart of subjectivity, and an attempt to finally tame the real.

Free

Dates & times

Date Time Add to calendar
21 Feb 2012 4:00pm - 6:00pm
  • apple
  • google
  • outlook

Accessibility

If you are attending an event and need the College to help with any mobility requirements you may have, please contact the event organiser in advance to ensure we can accommodate your needs.

Event controls

  • About us
  • Accessibility statement
  • Contact us
  • Cookie use
  • Find us
  • Copyright and disclaimer
  • Jobs
  • Modern slavery statement
Admin login
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • TikTok
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
© Goldsmiths, University of London Back to top