skip to main content
Goldsmiths - University of London
  • Students, Staff and Alumni
  • Search Students, Staff and Alumni
  • Study
  • Course finder
  • International
  • More
  • Search
  • Study
  • Courses
  • International
  • More
 
Main menu

Primary

  • About Goldsmiths
  • Study with us
  • Research
  • Business and partnerships
  • For the local community
  • Faculties and Schools
  • News and features
  • Events
  • Give to Goldsmiths
Staff & students

Staff + students

  • New students: Welcome
  • Students
  • Alumni
  • Library
  • Timetable
  • Learn.gold - VLE
  • Email - Outlook
  • IT support
  • Staff directory
  • Staff intranet - Goldmine
  • Graduate School - PGR students
  • Teaching and Learning Innovation Centre
  • Events admin
In this section

Breadcrumb navigation

  • Events
    • Degree Shows
    • Black History Month
  • Calendar

Happiness: The Failure of a New Science


24 Nov 2009, 6:00pm - 7:00pm

256, Richard Hoggart Building

Event overview

Cost Free, open to the public, no need to book
Department
Website APRU Invited Speaker Series, 2009/10
Contact c.french(@gold.ac.uk)
020 7919 7882

Presentation by writer, broadcaster and journalist Mark Vernon in the Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit Invited Speaker Series

The new sciences of happiness are generating lots of advice on how to keep smiling. The results are even being explored by policy wonks. So why does so much of it – work less, say thanks, keep fit – sound so trite? If it were that easy, wouldn’t we all be happy by now? The reason is that a central and tricky question is being glossed over: just what is happiness? Moreover, how you try to promote happiness depends entirely on what you take happiness to be – and there’s a wealth of choice in that. The sadness is that this has all been considered before, though there seems to be widespread ignorance of the fact. It was Jeremy Bentham who set up the greatest happiness principle and in the very next generation, his godson and prodigy, John Stuart Mill, who ditched it. What Bentham hadn’t grasped is that if you go for happiness head on, you won’t find it. Happiness is a byproduct of life, not an organising principle. From this follows a devastating critique of the so-called measures of happiness: they rest on assessing the pleasure people experience, but of course life is far more than an increase of pleasure. A rich life of necessity will also include pain, perhaps very great pain. It’s also clear that there are no objective measures of happiness, but only correlations: brain scans rest first on what people say, to which the scan is linked, and what people say depends greatly on what you ask them in the first place. This is why other economists interested in wellbeing say the measures of happiness used today are far too immature to be used in policy decisions. The new science of happiness is actually doing us a profound disservice. Therein lies its failure.

APRU Invited Speaker Series, 2009/10

Dates & times

Date Time Add to calendar
24 Nov 2009 6:00pm - 7:00pm
  • apple
  • google
  • outlook

Accessibility

If you are attending an event and need the College to help with any mobility requirements you may have, please contact the event organiser in advance to ensure we can accommodate your needs.

Event controls

  • About us
  • Accessibility statement
  • Contact us
  • Cookie use
  • Find us
  • Copyright and disclaimer
  • Jobs
  • Modern slavery statement
Admin login
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • TikTok
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
© Goldsmiths, University of London Back to top