We’re looking for a new Warden, following the announcement of the forthcoming retirement of Patrick Loughrey.
The Warden’s role is defined in Goldsmiths’ charter as the principal academic, administrative and executive officer of the College.
We want to make sure that stakeholders across and beyond the College are involved in this process, and that you have opportunities to help shape our Council’s search for the best candidate to lead Goldsmiths.
As the project progresses we will update this page, and actively promote further opportunities to engage in the process as they arise.
Council is responsible for appointing the College’s Warden, as set out in our Statutes. At its meeting on 20 September 2018, Council agreed that a sub-committee should be established to lead the search and form the final interview panel.
The ‘Search Committee’ will include external and internal members of Council, student and staff representation, and be chaired by the Chair of Council. The following individuals have so far agreed to be on the panel:
|Dinah Caine||Chair of Council|
|Vanessa Sharp||External member of Council|
|Helen MacNamara||External member of Council|
|Aaron Porter||External member of Council|
|John Price||Head of Department, member of Academic Board and Internal member of Council|
|Richard Noble||Head of Department, member of Academic Board and former Internal member of Council|
|JT||President of Goldsmiths’ Students Union|
The Committee will be supported in their work by the Registrar and Secretary, and the Director of HR.
Following a competitive tender process, Perrett Laver, an executive search firm, has been appointed to assist the Committee with aspects of the recruitment process.
We conducted an open web survey during October and November 2018 to seek initial views on the qualities and skills needed from Goldsmiths’ next Warden, and we received over 300 responses from across the College and beyond. This exercise was supplemented by a series of focus groups with students and staff during December 2018, and one-to-one discussions with key stakeholders. Together, around 150 members of the College community took part in this process, which captured views on the type of person Goldsmiths needs to meet future challenges and opportunities.
The feedback has been analysed and summary reports are available to read:
Insights gained from the consultation process have directly informed and shaped the person specification and candidate pack, as well as the wider approach to be adopted by the Search Committee.
The role is now being advertised, and applications are invited via the Perrett Laver website. Internal candidates should apply directly via this route.
Longlisting will take place during February 2019, proceeding to shortlisting and final interviews at the end of March 2019.
Taking on board feedback from staff and students, the Search Committee has committed to enabling small representative groups to meet shortlisted candidates and offer feedback to the Committee in an advisory capacity. Further details of this process will be finalised and published shortly.
We hope to be in a position to announce the name of Goldsmiths’ next Warden by Easter 2019.
Answers to detailed questions on the process can be found below.
Updated 8 January 2019
Why can the College not elect its next Warden?
Goldsmiths’ Council is the College’s governing body, and in accordance with good practice and regulatory rules, the majority of its members are independent. These members bring experience from outside the College on a voluntary basis, giving their time to help steer the strategic direction of the institution and ensure compliance with the legal and regulatory framework with which universities operate.
The appointment of a new Warden is a formal responsibility of Council, which also has a statutory role to safeguard the long term viability of the College and to have full and proper regard to the expectations of sector guidance on senior appointments.
Ultimately, members of Council cannot be expected to hold accountability for a key decision that they have not actually taken.
More fundamentally, the prospect of facing an election process is unlikely to encourage a diverse range of applications from the widest possible pool of candidates. Being identified publically as a candidate would be particularly discouraging for those currently working within the sector.
Why are we not holding hustings with candidates?
The Search Committee is concerned that open hustings would not promote the aim of encouraging a diverse range of applications from the widest possible pool of candidates. Large scale presentations typically play to the strengths of certain groups, and the committee is uncertain that such an exercise would help identify the best overall leader for the institution.
However, there will be opportunities for small groups of staff and students to meet shortlisted candidates, and to submit questions that will be used by the interview panel.
How can we be sure we are encouraging candidates from the broadest possible pool and from diverse backgrounds?
The Search Committee is working with an executive search firm to advertise the role widely (including overseas) and to approach suitable potential candidates directly. We have made clear in all public material that Goldsmiths is particularly keen to hear from candidates from groups currently under-represented at senior levels of higher education.
Who is on the Search Committee and how were they selected?
The appointment of a new Warden is a formal responsibility of Goldsmiths’ governing Council, as set out in the College statutes. Council, which will in due course confirm the recommended appointment, has delegated the necessary steps to get us to this point to a Search Committee chaired by the Chair of Council.
The current membership of the committee can be found above. The Committee is of the same size and similar composition to that which recommended the appointment of our current Warden in 2009/10 and reflects its status as a Council committee, with both internal and external Council membership.
Council initially delegated setting up the Committee to the Chair, so work could commence promptly, before approving its composition and terms of reference at its meeting in November 2018.
Council is keen to ensure the recruitment process reflects the diversity of Goldsmiths’ staff and student bodies. Staff and student input is therefore being sought throughout the process.
How can staff and students continue to be involved in the selection process?
The Search Committee has listened carefully to the range of feedback received from students, staff and other stakeholders through the open web survey and focus groups which took place in the autumn term of 2018. This input has shaped the candidate pack and wider approach adopted by the committee.
While there is no ‘nomination’ process, staff and students are encouraged to share information about the vacancy with potential candidates ahead of the application deadline of 5 February.
Looking ahead, small groups of staff and students will meet shortlisted candidates, in confidence, towards the end of the process. Feedback from these groups will be considered carefully by the interview panel as part of their final assessment of candidates. Information on how to express an interest to join one of these groups will be issued in due course.
The Search Committee will also be developing a mechanism to meet the request that questions from students and staff can be put to shortlisted candidates as part of the final selection process.