skip to main content
Goldsmiths - University of London
  • Staff & students
  • Search
  • Main menu
 
Main menu

Primary

  • Home
  • Course finder
  • Study with us
  • Departments
  • Research
  • Services for Business
  • For the local community
  • Alumni and friends
  • News
  • Events
  • About us
Staff & students

Staff + students

  • Students
  • Library
  • Timetable
  • Learn.gold - VLE
  • Email - Outlook
  • IT support
  • Staff directory
  • Goldmine - staff intranet
  • Graduate School - PGR students
  • Teaching and Learning Innovation Centre
  • Events admin
In this section

Breadcrumb navigation

  • About us
    • Contact
    • Find us
    • Working at Goldsmiths
    • About Goldsmiths
    • Our misson, values and strategy
    • Governance
    • Our history
    • Student and graduate profiles
    • Senior Management Team
    • Community
    • Equality and Diversity
    • Academic Partnerships
    • Open Book
    • Goldsmiths Centre for Contemporary Art
    • Goldsmiths Global
    • Goldsmiths Press
    • Term dates
  • News
  • Social distancing and contagion model
Open social sharing
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Whatsapp

Model shows factors influencing social distancing success

Institute of Management Studies

Article

Written bySarah Cox
Published on 4 May 2020

Delaying the implementation of social distancing measures by just a few days can double the number of people likely to be infected with Covid-19, a new mathematical model co-developed by Goldsmiths, University of London suggests.

Image of a play park with access blocked by safety tape

This is one of the findings from modelling by Goldsmiths’ Giorgos Galanis and colleagues at the University of Oxford and University of Technology Sydney, which focuses on the important role of individuals’ decision-making in the success of social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Their analysis reveals that early mild measures seem to be, in general, more effective than later harsher policies. The timing of policy interventions significantly impacts on the cumulative number of cases, its evolution over time, and the total time required for the contagion to die out.

The choices individuals make when faced with social distancing measures, the timing of interventions, and uncertainties around information are the key factors in determining how successful such measures will be, according to the study. 

When modelling behaviour, the researchers assumed that individual decisions are based on an imperfect set of information, which is limited to data about confirmed cases of covid-19. Decisions about social distancing were modelled as a binary choice: to do it or not do it.

The research suggests that giving the public accurate information on the extent of the pandemic, for instance through mass-testing of the population, is vital. This information influences people’s decision making in two ways: directly, by leading confirmed cases to self-isolate, and indirectly, by affecting the public perception of the probability of getting infected and therefore the attitude towards social distancing. 

As the choices individuals make play such a decisive role in the evolution of the total number of people infected, and the shape of the curve of daily confirmed cases, the team conclude that individual decision making behaviour should be taken into account when formulating policy around imposing or lifting social distancing restrictions.

‘Social distancing and contagion in a discrete choice model of COVID-19’ by Giorgos Baskozos (University of Oxford), Giorgos Galanis (Goldsmiths, University of London) and Corrado Di Guilmi (University of Technology Sydney) was published as part of the University of Warwick CRETA Discussion Paper Series on 13 April 2020.

 

  • About us
  • Accessibility statement
  • Contact us
  • Cookie use
  • Find us
  • Copyright and disclaimer
  • Jobs
  • Modern slavery statement
Admin login
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
© Goldsmiths, University of London Back to top