skip to main content
Goldsmiths - University of London
  • Staff & students
  • Search
  • Main menu
 
Main menu

Primary

  • Home
  • Course finder
  • Study with us
  • Departments
  • Research
  • Services for Business
  • For the local community
  • Alumni and friends
  • News
  • Events
  • About us
Staff & students

Staff + students

  • Students
  • Library
  • Timetable
  • Learn.gold - VLE
  • Email - Outlook
  • IT support
  • Staff directory
  • Goldmine - staff intranet
  • Graduate School - PGR students
  • Teaching and Learning Innovation Centre
  • Events admin
In this section

Breadcrumb navigation

  • About us
    • Contact
    • Find us
    • Working at Goldsmiths
    • About Goldsmiths
    • Our misson, values and strategy
    • Governance
    • Our history
    • Student and graduate profiles
    • Senior Management Team
    • Community
    • Equality and Diversity
    • Academic Partnerships
    • Open Book
    • Goldsmiths Centre for Contemporary Art
    • Goldsmiths Global
    • Goldsmiths Press
    • Term dates
  • News
  • Look ahead to 2018
Open social sharing
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Whatsapp

Back to the future: Goldsmiths experts look to 2018

Computing, History, Media, Communications and Cultural Studies

Article

Written byIman Mohamed
Published on 22 Dec 2017

A number of significant moments and anniversaries will be marked across the UK in 2018, while important issues from the last 12 months will continue to dominate public debate.  

As we say goodbye to 2017, members of the Goldsmiths community look ahead to what next year may bring. 

Anniversaries of women's suffrage movement

Emily Pankhurst with suffragettes in 1908.

VOTE 100 reveals 2018 to be a complex anniversary for women’s suffrage.

While February marks 100 years since the Representation of the People Act enabled all men and women to vote, is it the Equal Franchise Act of 1928 which gave women the right to vote on the same terms as men. 

These two anniversaries remind us that achieving equality is an incremental process of resilient campaign. While today women’s suffrage is enshrined in law, it does not guarantee a sense of enfranchisement for all women.

Freedom of expression, the pursuit of education and full participation in public life are rights that need constant affirmation by individuals and groups on a daily basis. 100 years and more of feminist scholarship, activism and practice work towards not only claiming but safeguarding women’s political and social space to think and thrive.

The vote gives voice but to be heard is an intersectional collective endeavour we engage with everyday. Some 100 and 90 years on, this anniversary marks crucial moments when women contributed to the continuum of action we need to secure full equality for all in 2018.

Althea Greenan, Special Collection and Archives Curator, The Women's Art Library

Representation in the cultural industries

Image taken from Ghost in the Shell.

This year threw up some very troubling racial controversies regarding the representation of minorities in the media – from whitewashing in the casting of Scarlett Johansson in Ghost In The Shell and Ed Skrein quitting the latest Hellboy reboot, to airbrushing – Solange in the Evening Standard, Lupita Nyong'o in Gracia – via silencing in the sacking of Munroe Bergdorf by L'Oréal.

The fact is, is that the cultural industries – which remain overwhelmingly white, with diversity initiatives having little impact – are increasingly savvy about the inclusion of minority in their productions, mostly driven by the fear of public backlash.

Will this lead to more meaningful roles for people of colour? I predict we’re going to see a hypervisibility of black and Asian folk in the coming year, but mostly in terms of either peripheral roles, or a race-less version of diversity.

In other words minorities will literally be employed to add colour to a production, and that is all. The year will no doubt produce a few breakout hits, as we saw in 2017, but these will do little to budge the cultural industries’ fundamental risk adverse behaviour, especially when dealing with people of colour.

While we will see more minorities in the British media, perhaps more than any point in history, how much will we actually learn about minority experience?

Dr Anamik Saha, Department of Media and Communications

Centenary of the end of the First World War

Poppies at the Tower of London

Historians are generally much happier explaining the past then predicting the future, but luckily, the mists of time have already parted to reveal some of next year’s issues – if not outcomes – with unusual clarity.  

November 2018 marks the centenary of the end of the First World War – the commemorations are likely to keep me very busy – and looking back to that conflict, when the future of Europe was in contention and the USA took its first steps toward superpower status, is oddly apposite. 

In politics, Europe’s future – and Britain’s presence (or absence) in it – will again be fought over, though more peaceably than in 1918.  The ever dramatic Brexit negotiations are, of course, a part of this, but there are also wider issues at stake.  Will the continental union take reforming steps to put itself at last on a stable political and economic footing?

Whether Donald Trump arrives on our shores next year for a “working visit” is still unclear. On past performance though, there seems little doubt that his presidency will continue lurching from crisis to crisis – unless, that is, special prosecutor Robert Mueller finds evidence that he did indeed collude with the Russians. At all events, what is certain is that as long as Trump remains in power the US’s hard-won prestige and international status will continue to decline.

Professor Alexander Watson, Department of History

AI: we need to talk about impact on data use

Artificial Intelligence graphic

The coming 12 months will be a key year for AI in terms of public consciousness.

We’re in a relationship with systems that continually analyse us, and the data we provide supports the development of new AIs.

At present, there’s not much evidence that people find this situation concerning.

Public discourse around AI tends to focus on what might happen if a machine was considered intelligent in the same way that a person might be considered intelligent.

This idea is somehow bound up with notions of consciousness and sentience, and this might seem threatening.

However, a potentially more pressing question might be this: can our data be used to manipulate how we behave and make decisions?

Given news that such approaches may have impacted on our democracy, I think we might see a more rational debate emerging around the future of AI that could be more productive in the long term.

Professor Mick Grierson, Department of Computing

70 years since the Windrush

A reveller at Notting Hill Carnival

Windrush Pioneers

The shaping of a nation, such a huge collaboration

Some 70 years on, there is much that has been gained

There is also much that has gone

Greeted with resentment and hostility

The Windrush generation built a legacy

One, we are reminded, that needs to be celebrated and heard

A shaping of British cultural, social and political life, not as they feared

Sacrifices made by a generation in search of a different life

Promises made, some kept, some lost

For the Windrush Pioneers at what cost?

An unknown destination, Wickham Road and Tanners Hill

Both not far from Goldsmiths, yet still!

We have within this institution an obligation to assist

We have the researchers, we have the archives,

Let us not be remiss

Dr Marl'ene Edwin, Centre for Caribbean and Diaspora Studies

Politics to remain a rollercoaster

Polling station sign

British politics is nothing except unpredictable at the moment. At the start of 2017, experts confidently predicted that Theresa May would lead a long period of Conservative dominance.

Academics might be bad at predicting the future, because they tend to know more about the past, and assume things will carry on the same.

Looking back at my predictions for last year, I was fairly confident there would be a general election in 2017. I didn't expect Jeremy Corbyn to do so well.

 

The big question for 2018 is whether May can hang on for the year. Short of a story coming out of left-field (not unlikely with Trump and Kim Jong-un in power), the big story in 2018 for us will be the Brexit negotiations.

Will May gain a coalition of support for a relatively soft Brexit that keeps Britain's easy access to European markets?

Can she hold together the pro-business, soft Brexit wing of her party with the hard-line Brexiteers? Will she hold off a challenge from Gove, Johnson or someone else? My view is probably to all of that.

And how difficult will negotiations be? The more it looks like a hard Brexit, the more the future of the United Kingdom will come into question as Scotland rethinks its place in Europe and pressure is placed on the Northern Irish peace agreement. 

Dr Simon Griffiths, Department of Politics and International Relations 

Our world renowned experts

Prof Alexander Watson

Alexander’s current research looks at conflict and identity in East-Central Europe and the concept of total war.

  • About us
  • Accessibility statement
  • Contact us
  • Cookie use
  • Find us
  • Copyright and disclaimer
  • Jobs
  • Modern slavery statement
Admin login
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
© Goldsmiths, University of London Back to top